They say the human mind will be the last frontier. Not space,
not the ocean, but our very own brains.
One of the many remarkable things about our minds is their
memory. Not necessarily how exceptional it is, but rather how fallible it can
be. Perhaps you’ve looked at a picture of yourself from many years ago, an
event at which you could have sworn you had been wearing your favorite
pink blouse, not that summer dress. Or perhaps you’ve reminisced with a friend
about your 7th birthday party, and he claimed there had been vanilla
cake when you know very well it had been chocolate, only for your mother to
walk in and tell you there was no cake because you had asked for sugar cookies
that year instead.
Sound familiar? No? Well, case in point.
Such blips in our memory are often harmless— hilarious
anecdotes we’ll tell our kids about one day. But when it comes to writing these
potentially false memories down, and especially when publishing them as a
memoir, we may run into some issues.
In her article “Nothing but the Truth?: On Lying and MemoirWriting” Maddie Crum writes, “There is, after all, a
fluidity between who we were to other people, who we thought we were, who we
think we were, and who we think we are now.”
Our thoughts and perspectives change gradually over time.
This is not an overnight process, hence the “fluidity” that Crum speaks of. But
because of this fluidity, we often look at the past through the biased lens of
the present. This makes human memory fallible and malleable, which will always
inevitably affect nonfiction writing.
However, I would argue that this is not necessarily a bad
thing. After all, as Crum states, “The desired effect [of
nonfiction] is to allow listeners, and readers, to feel how we felt, not to
merely be aware of the literal circumstances lending to the feeling.”
Of course, completely making up things that never even
happened in the first place would defeat the purpose of nonfiction entirely, but
considering memoirs, and nonfiction in general, as an art form should, in my
mind, allow for some creative liberties. Twisting the details of your story or
slightly changing the chronology of events to a certain extent shouldn’t be
cause for alarm as long as these alterations serve a stylistic or thematical purpose
in the work.
My absolutely all-time favorite memoir (and book for
that matter) is Educated by Tara Westover. In this memoir, Tara
tells her story starting in her childhood when she grew up in the mountains of
Idaho in an isolated Mormon community. She had several siblings, and her
parents never let any of them see a doctor, even for severe injuries, or go to
school because they distrusted the government. Tara and her family would also store
canned peaches in their basement and always have a “head for the hills” bag
ready to go in case the Second Coming of Christ should surprise them.
Eventually, however, she manages to escape her sheltered home and abusive
family and goes to college, where she struggles to adapt to a world she never
knew. Later, she attends Cambridge and Harvard University and earns a doctorate
degree. By the end of her story, she has decided to live estranged from her
parents and some of her siblings.
There is some
controversy around this book, specifically about the truthfulness of the
narrative since Tara’s parents claim the story did not happen the way it was
written. However, given the extreme isolation and distrust Tara describes in
relation to her parents, it does not surprise me that they would make such a
claim. Additionally, in the first line of the first chapter, Tara acknowledges
the malleability and unreliability of memory discussed above: “My strongest
memory is not a memory. It’s something I imagined, then came to remember as if
it had happened.”
One of the biggest
reasons why I love this book so much is because of what it teaches the reader
about education. By reading this, I learned the value and privilege of an
education and that education does not always need to be linked with school.
School is merely a system through which education is provided but becoming
educated can also manifest itself as a new perspective and the willingness to
change old ways of thinking. The last line of the book really drives this
concept home:
“You could call this
selfhood many things. Transformation. Metamorphosis. Falsity. Betrayal. I call
it an education.”
This memoir teaches its readers to separate school and education and what an education can encompass
outside of the system it’s associated with, such as the development of a new selfhood.
I strongly believe that Educated works best and is
most powerful in its complete novel form and therefore likely would not
function well if transferred to a blog format. In order to split it into blog
posts, it would likely have to be shortened and the scenes condensed, which I
fear may take something away from the story.
As for how my reading experience would change if I were to
learn that Tara blurred the lines between fact and fiction, I’m honestly not
sure. I think much of the story’s power lies in its presentation as a memoir,
but given the traumatic nature of Tara’s childhood, it wouldn’t necessarily shock
me if some of the events were not entirely accurate. Again, given the fluidity
of human memory, it seems unlikely that any memoir is 100% truthful. But like
Crum says, the goal is to get the reader to feel what the author felt, not
necessarily know exactly what happened to them.
And that is something Tara does exceptionally well.
A good read. I know some outlets have suggested that she stretched the truth a bit too but she admits that in the book and indicates that her memories may differ from her siblings/parents. I find this occurs with my siblings as well; we remember things differently.
ReplyDelete